Who Has To Calm Down First?
AIThis post was created with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI).

TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get gifts for the two of you delivered free with Prime

  • Fast, free delivery on millions of items
  • Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
  • Member-only deals all year
Start your free Prime trial Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

The Gottman Institute’s guidance on arguments says a pause is appropriate when either partner becomes too overwhelmed to listen or think clearly. The person asking for a break should explain their own feelings and agree on when to return; the other partner should honor the request. The source does not establish that one person always has to calm down first.

The Gottman Institute’s guidance on arguments says either partner can request a pause when emotional overwhelm makes it difficult to listen or think clearly. The advice does not require one person to become calm before the other will listen: the partner asking for time should explain that they feel overwhelmed and agree on when the conversation will resume, while the other honors the request.

The guidance distinguishes strong feelings from what John and Julie Gottman call flooding: a state of physical and emotional overwhelm that can make it hard to take in what a partner is saying. A person who goes quiet or leaves the room may not be calm or indifferent; they may be overwhelmed and trying to stop the conversation.

The Gottmans describe the body’s response to perceived threat as involving stress hormones, including adrenaline and cortisol. A person may feel their heart pounding or clench their jaw, and agitation can continue after they stop speaking. In that state, a partner’s explanation may be difficult to follow, while the overwhelmed person may be focused on defending themselves or ending the exchange.

The source advises against telling a partner, “you’re getting flooded,” because that can sound blaming or patronizing and shift the argument to who gets to define the other person’s feelings. Instead, the person seeking a break should speak about their own experience and set a time to return. The Gottmans also advise taking a break when a partner asks for one, even if the other person feels ready to keep talking.

At a glance
reportWhen: Published in The Gottman Institute’s re…
The developmentThe Gottman Institute’s relationship guidance explains that either partner can call a pause during an argument when emotional overwhelm makes listening difficult.

A Pause Can Protect the Conversation

The guidance describes a conflict pattern in which one partner pushes to keep talking because silence feels dismissive, while the other withdraws because continued discussion feels overwhelming. These responses can reinforce each other: one partner may press harder for an answer as the other pulls away. The discussion may end with neither person feeling heard.

The Gottmans present a pause as a way to make listening possible again, rather than as a judgment about who is right. They advise against demanding that a partner “calm down,” which can imply that their feelings must disappear before they receive attention. Their approach treats overwhelm as a reason to stop temporarily and recommends agreeing on a return time so the break does not end the discussion without explanation.

The guidance notes that conflict styles vary. A raised voice does not by itself establish that someone cannot listen, and silence does not prove that someone does not care. It focuses instead on whether either person has become too overwhelmed to follow what the other is saying. The Gottmans say continuing to argue in that state can make mutual understanding more difficult.

Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Noise-Cancelling Earbuds, Black

Bose QuietComfort True Wireless Noise-Cancelling Earbuds, Black

Breville Bambino Espresso Machine, Brushed Stainless Steel (BES450BSS)

Breville Bambino Espresso Machine, Brushed Stainless Steel (BES450BSS)

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.

Different Families, Different Conflict Styles

The Gottmans use the term meta-emotion for how people feel about emotions and what they believe should happen when feelings are expressed. Someone may see anger as something to talk through; another may have learned to avoid it. Those assumptions can shape a couple’s argument even when the immediate disagreement seems small.

The source illustrates that mismatch through Tyler and Noah. Tyler, who grew up in a family where arguments were frequent and followed by reconciliation, raised his voice during disagreements. Noah, whose parents rarely fought but sometimes said hurtful things or left, tended to stop responding or leave. Tyler interpreted the withdrawal as a sign his feelings did not matter; Noah expected continued discussion to bring more yelling. Their different histories helped explain why the same pattern could arise over varied disagreements.

John Gottman’s research, as summarized by the Institute, describes three broad conflict styles: conflict-avoiding, validating and volatile. The report says happy, stable couples can have any of the three styles, and it does not present one style as automatically healthier. The issue is not simply whether partners argue loudly or avoid debate; it is how their approaches interact and whether they can listen, respond and return to a discussion.

““take one, even if you personally don’t need it””

— John and Julie Gottman, in Fight Right, as quoted in The Gottman Institute report

No Universal First Responder

The source does not identify one partner, gender or conflict style as the person who must always pause first. Its guidance is conditional: either partner can ask for a break when overwhelmed, and the other should respect that request. It also does not provide a test for determining from outside whether a particular person is flooded; the advice emphasizes describing one’s own feelings rather than diagnosing a partner.

The report gives no fixed duration for a break and does not specify what couples should do if one person repeatedly asks for time but does not return to the conversation. It also does not claim that pausing will resolve the underlying disagreement. The source’s central point is narrower: when someone cannot listen or think clearly, a pause can create room to resume the discussion later.

Agree on When to Resume

The next step described in the guidance is practical: the person asking for a pause says they feel overwhelmed and agrees with their partner on a time to return. The other person honors the request, even if they believe the conversation could continue. The source does not prescribe a particular number of minutes or hours, so the return time must be agreed between the partners.

When the conversation resumes, the couple can return to the issue they had been discussing rather than treating the pause as proof that one person was wrong. The Institute’s report also suggests that partners may benefit from learning what each expects when someone is upset—whether they expect comfort, discussion, space or something else. Those expectations may not have been discussed even in a long relationship.

Key Questions

Who should calm down first during an argument?

The Gottman Institute’s guidance does not assign the responsibility to one partner. Either person can request a pause if they are too overwhelmed to listen or think clearly, and the other should honor the request.

What does “flooding” mean in this guidance?

Flooding refers to physical and emotional overwhelm that makes it difficult to listen, think clearly or take in a partner’s words. The report describes signs such as a pounding heart, a clenched jaw and continued agitation.

Does asking for a break mean someone is avoiding the issue?

Not necessarily. The report says a quiet or withdrawn partner may be overwhelmed rather than indifferent. Its advice is to agree on a time to return to the conversation; it does not say that every request for a break is evidence of avoidance.

What should someone say when they need a pause?

The guidance recommends describing one’s own state—for example, saying that the conversation feels overwhelming—and agreeing on when to resume. It cautions against telling a partner, “you’re getting flooded,” which may sound like blame or a judgment about their feelings.

Are volatile couples less healthy than conflict-avoiding couples?

The source says the Gottmans found happy, stable couples across conflict-avoiding, validating and volatile styles. It does not rank one style as automatically healthier; it emphasizes how partners handle differences and whether they can listen and reconnect.

Source: gottman.com

You May Also Like

Reconciliation Deal Breakers: Why It Feels Harder Than Anyone Admits

Bridging emotional and financial gaps reveals hidden barriers that make reconciliation harder than anyone admits, and understanding these is key to healing.

How to Prevent Cheating: Strengthening Your Relationship Proactively

Consistently strengthening your relationship through honest communication and trust-building can prevent cheating—discover how to create a resilient bond today.

Kylie Kelce Taylor Swift Relationship

Speculation grows around Kylie Kelce and Taylor Swift’s relationship, with fans and sources discussing potential romance developments.

Self-Care After Heartbreak: Recovering Your Emotional Health

Absolutely—discover essential self-care strategies to heal emotionally after heartbreak and learn how to rebuild your strength and happiness.